Enhancing Project Management Effectiveness in Public Service: An Exploration of Methodologies, Stakeholder Engagement, and Leadership Dynamics

List of Key Terms, Abbreviations, and Acronyms

Key Term/Abbreviation	Definition/Explanation
Agile Project Management (APM)	A flexible and iterative approach to project management that focuses on collaboration, customer feedback, and small, rapid releases (Bogdanova et al., 2020).
Feasibility Study	An analysis and evaluation of a proposed project to determine its viability and potential success, considering factors like stakeholders, barriers, and constraints (Pearson et al., 2020).
Goal Clarity	The extent to which project objectives are clearly defined and understood by all stakeholders, influencing the effectiveness of project management (Zada et al., 2023).
Project Scope	The boundaries and limitations of a project, including its objectives, deliverables, and constraints, crucial for project planning and execution (Gasik, 2023).
Public Service Project (PSP)	An initiative undertaken by public sector organisations to deliver services, enhance public welfare, or address societal issues (Eriksson et al., 2020).
Stakeholder Engagement	The process of involving individuals, groups, or organisations that are affected by or can affect a project, to ensure their needs and expectations are considered (Twum-Darko et al., 2023).
Traditional Project Management (TPM)	A conventional approach to project management characterised by a linear sequence of phases, including initiation, planning, execution, monitoring, and closure (Kaczorowska, 2020).

1.3 Introduction and Background to the Study

In the evolving landscape of public administration, project management has emerged as a critical discipline, especially in the execution of public service projects (PSPs). The increasing complexity and demand for accountability in public services necessitate the adoption of effective project management methodologies (Bogdanova et al., 2020). Public sector organisations face unique challenges, including political, social, and economic pressures, which often impact their ability to deliver projects successfully (Eriksson et al., 2020). The traditional project management (TPM) approach, characterised by its structured and linear nature, has been the cornerstone of public sector project execution for decades. However, the dynamic and uncertain environment of the public sector calls for more adaptive and flexible methodologies, such as Agile Project Management (APM), which emphasises collaboration, responsiveness, and iterative progress (Bogdanova et al., 2020).

Furthermore, stakeholder engagement and leadership play pivotal roles in the success of public service projects. Effective stakeholder engagement ensures that the diverse needs and expectations of various interest groups are considered, leading to more sustainable and impactful project outcomes (Twum-Darko et al., 2023). Additionally, the role of leadership, particularly in providing goal clarity and securing top management support, has been identified as a key factor in enhancing project management effectiveness in public services (Zada et al., 2023). This study, therefore, seeks to explore the intersection of project management methodologies, stakeholder engagement, and leadership dynamics within the context of public service projects.

1.4 Statement of the Research Problem, Research Question, Aim, and Objectives

Research Problem: Despite the critical role of project management in the public sector, there remains a gap in the effective implementation of projects that align with public interests and deliver tangible benefits. Traditional project management approaches, while structured, often fall short in addressing the complexities and uncertainties inherent in public service projects (Kaczorowska, 2020). Additionally, the lack of effective stakeholder engagement and leadership support further exacerbates challenges in project delivery, leading to inefficiencies, delays, and unmet objectives (Eriksson et al., 2020; Twum-Darko et al., 2023). The research problem thus centres on identifying and evaluating methodologies, stakeholder engagement practices, and leadership strategies that can enhance project management effectiveness in public service contexts.

Research Question: How can project management effectiveness in public service projects be enhanced through the adoption of appropriate methodologies, stakeholder engagement, and leadership practices?

Aim: The primary aim of this study is to investigate and evaluate the impact of various project management methodologies, stakeholder engagement practices, and leadership strategies on the effectiveness of public service projects. By doing so, the study aims to propose a framework for enhancing project management practices in the public sector.

Objectives:

• To critically analyse traditional and Agile project management methodologies and their applicability to public service projects
• To assess the role of stakeholder engagement in the planning and execution of public service projects .
• To evaluate the influence of leadership dynamics, such as goal clarity and top management support, on the success of public service projects .
• To develop a comprehensive framework that integrates project management methodologies, stakeholder engagement, and leadership strategies to enhance project effectiveness in the public sector.

1.5 Project Scope

The scope of this research encompasses a comprehensive analysis of project management practices within the public sector, focusing specifically on the application of Agile and traditional project management methodologies, stakeholder engagement, and leadership dynamics. The study will explore public service projects across various sectors, including healthcare, infrastructure, and social services, to provide a holistic understanding of the challenges and opportunities in project management (Eriksson et al., 2020). It will also examine the constraints and barriers that public sector organisations face, such as bureaucratic processes, resource limitations, and political influences (Gasik, 2023).

By focusing on the key elements of project management effectiveness—methodology, stakeholder engagement, and leadership—the research aims to offer insights into how public service projects can be better managed to achieve their intended outcomes. However, the study will not delve into specific project management tools or software; rather, it will emphasise the strategic and organisational aspects of project management within the public sector. The findings of this research are intended to inform public service managers, policymakers, and project management professionals on best practices for managing complex public service projects effectively.

Section 2: Feasibility Study

2.1 Stakeholder Analysis

Stakeholder analysis is a crucial component in assessing the feasibility of any public service project. This research involves a diverse group of stakeholders, including public service managers, policymakers, project management professionals, and the general public. The role of these stakeholders is fundamental, as they contribute different perspectives, expertise, and resources to the research process. As Twum-Darko et al. (2023) point out, effective stakeholder engagement in public sector projects can lead to improved service delivery outcomes, as it ensures that diverse viewpoints and interests are considered throughout the project lifecycle. This study will identify key stakeholders, such as government agencies, public service organisations, project managers, and beneficiaries of public services, who have a vested interest in the effectiveness of public service project management.

Engaging stakeholders in the research process allows for a more comprehensive understanding of the current practices, challenges, and needs within public service project management. According to Coetzee et al. (2020), stakeholder analysis helps to identify who the primary decision-makers and influencers are, enabling researchers to understand whose needs must be prioritised to achieve project success. For this research, stakeholders will be categorised into primary and secondary groups. Primary stakeholders include public service managers and policymakers who directly influence project management practices. Secondary stakeholders, such as beneficiaries of public services and academic experts, provide additional insights that can inform the research. Engaging with these groups will help identify gaps in current practices and areas for improvement, ensuring that the research outcomes are relevant and actionable.

2.2 Barriers and Constraints

Conducting research in the public sector is often fraught with various barriers and constraints, which can impact the feasibility and success of the study. One significant barrier is the bureaucratic nature of public sector organisations, which can lead to delays in obtaining necessary approvals and access to relevant data (Gasik, 2023). Bureaucratic hurdles can limit the availability of timely and accurate information, thereby affecting the depth and quality of the research findings. Additionally, public service projects often involve multiple layers of stakeholders with competing interests, making it challenging to gain consensus on the research objectives and methodologies (Twum-Darko et al., 2023). This complexity requires careful negotiation and communication strategies to ensure that stakeholders’ needs and concerns are adequately addressed.

Resource limitations are another constraint that can affect the research. Public sector projects often operate within tight budgetary and resource constraints, which may limit the scope of data collection and analysis (Pearson et al., 2020). Furthermore, the availability of experienced project managers and access to primary data sources can pose additional challenges, especially when attempting to gather comprehensive information on project management practices across various sectors. Addressing these barriers will involve employing a systematic approach to stakeholder engagement, leveraging secondary data sources, and using a mixed-methods approach to ensure that the research remains feasible and manageable within the available resources. By anticipating and planning for these barriers, the research can be designed to navigate these challenges effectively.

2.3 Expected Results

The expected results of this research project include a comprehensive evaluation of project management practices in the public sector, with a focus on methodologies, stakeholder engagement, and leadership dynamics. It is anticipated that the study will reveal the effectiveness of Agile project management methodologies in enhancing the adaptability and responsiveness of public service projects (Bogdanova et al., 2020). The research is also expected to highlight the critical role of stakeholder engagement in improving project outcomes, demonstrating how effective communication and collaboration with stakeholders can lead to more successful project execution (Twum-Darko et al., 2023). Furthermore, the study aims to identify the impact of leadership practices, such as goal clarity and top management support, on project success, providing insights into how public service organisations can leverage leadership to drive project effectiveness (Zada et al., 2023).

By offering a nuanced understanding of these factors, the research is expected to contribute to the development of a strategic framework for enhancing project management practices in public service. This framework will provide practical guidelines for public service managers and policymakers, enabling them to adopt more effective project management methodologies, foster stakeholder engagement, and enhance leadership practices within their organisations. Ultimately, the findings will inform policy and practice, promoting a more efficient and effective public service delivery that aligns with the needs and expectations of the public.

2.4 Project Timeline

The project timeline is structured to ensure that each phase of the research is conducted systematically and within a manageable timeframe. Following the guidelines by Pearson et al. (2020), the timeline spans over six months, starting with the initial phase of stakeholder identification and engagement, which will take approximately one month. During this period, the research team will reach out to key stakeholders, including public service managers, policymakers, and project management professionals, to gather preliminary insights and secure their participation in the study.

The second phase involves conducting a thorough literature review and developing the research design, which is expected to take two months. This phase will involve an in-depth analysis of existing literature on project management methodologies, stakeholder engagement, and leadership in public service projects (Bogdanova et al., 2020; Kaczorowska, 2020). The research design will outline the mixed-methods approach, data collection strategies, and analytical techniques to be employed in the study. The third phase will focus on data collection and analysis, spanning two months. This phase will involve gathering both primary and secondary data through interviews, surveys, and document analysis, followed by a detailed examination of the data to identify key themes and patterns (Hendren et al., 2023).

The final phase will be dedicated to compiling the research findings, developing the strategic framework, and preparing the final report. This phase is projected to take one month, during which the research team will synthesise the findings, draw conclusions, and formulate recommendations for enhancing project management practices in public service. The report will then be reviewed and refined based on feedback from stakeholders and experts in the field, ensuring that the research outcomes are robust and actionable. By adhering to this timeline, the research aims to deliver comprehensive and meaningful insights into public service project management, contributing to the ongoing discourse on improving public sector effectiveness.

Section 3: Literature Review

The body of literature on public service project management offers diverse perspectives on methodologies, stakeholder engagement, and leadership dynamics. Bogdanova et al. (2020) emphasise the significance of Agile project management (APM) in the public sector, highlighting its ability to address complexities and adapt to changing requirements more efficiently than traditional project management (TPM). Similarly, Kaczorowska (2020) contrasts APM with TPM within the Polish public sector context, pointing out that while APM fosters flexibility and stakeholder involvement, its implementation can be hindered by organisational resistance and rigid public sector cultures. Gasik (2023) further explores the future of project management in public administration, suggesting that a shift towards more adaptive and iterative approaches like APM is crucial for enhancing public service project outcomes. These studies collectively support the proposed research’s aim to explore the effectiveness of various project management methodologies in the public sector, with a particular focus on how adaptability and responsiveness can improve project outcomes.

Stakeholder engagement is another pivotal theme in public service project management literature. Twum-Darko et al. (2023) argue that stakeholder engagement is integral to the success of public service projects, as it ensures that the diverse needs and expectations of stakeholders are incorporated into the project planning and execution phases. Coetzee et al. (2020) also emphasise the importance of stakeholder analysis, noting that understanding stakeholder needs and interests can lead to more inclusive and sustainable outcomes in public service delivery. Additionally, Bahadorestani et al. (2020) discuss the challenges of managing conflicting stakeholder interests and highlight the necessity of sustainable stakeholder engagement strategies to navigate these complexities. These insights align with the proposed research’s focus on evaluating the role of stakeholder engagement in public service project success, particularly in terms of fostering goal clarity and minimising resistance. By examining the strategies for effective stakeholder involvement, the research aims to offer practical recommendations for public service managers to enhance project outcomes.

Leadership dynamics in the public sector are intricately linked to project management effectiveness. Zada et al. (2023) explore how public leadership can influence project outcomes through the mediating role of goal clarity and the moderating role of top management support. Their findings suggest that effective leadership practices, such as clear communication of project objectives and securing top management support, are vital for guiding public service projects toward success. Eriksson et al. (2020) delve into collaborative public management, emphasising the importance of coordinated leadership efforts among various public service organisations to deliver value. Similarly, Irfan et al. (2021) focus on the competencies of project managers, asserting that leadership skills and strategic vision significantly contribute to public sector project success. These studies highlight the multifaceted nature of leadership in public service project management, underscoring the need for a strategic and collaborative approach. The proposed research builds on this foundation by investigating how different leadership dynamics, such as transformational and collaborative leadership, can enhance project management practices and drive successful public service delivery.

In addition to these primary themes, the literature also sheds light on the interplay between project management methodologies, stakeholder engagement, and leadership dynamics. Casady et al. (2020) explore public-private partnerships (PPPs) within the new public governance paradigm, suggesting that institutional maturity and inter-organizational collaboration are essential for the success of complex public service projects. Eriksson et al. (2020) further emphasise the role of coordinated value propositions among public service organisations in achieving project success. Wickert et al. (2021) argue that management research should have a broader impact, indicating that the integration of effective project management practices can lead to tangible improvements in public service delivery. The proposed study aims to integrate these perspectives, developing a comprehensive framework that addresses the complexities of public service project management by incorporating adaptive methodologies, strategic stakeholder engagement, and effective leadership practices.

While previous research offers valuable insights, there is a noticeable gap in the literature regarding a holistic approach that combines project management methodologies, stakeholder engagement, and leadership dynamics within the public sector. Studies such as those by Bogdanova et al. (2020), Twum-Darko et al. (2023), and Zada et al. (2023) provide individual analyses of these components, but an integrative examination is required to fully understand how these elements interact to influence public service project outcomes. The proposed research seeks to fill this gap by providing an in-depth analysis of these interconnected factors, offering both theoretical and practical contributions to the field of public service project management. Furthermore, by comparing findings from different contexts, such as the work of Kaczorowska (2020) in Poland and Twum-Darko et al. (2023) in South Africa, the study aims to enhance the generalizability and applicability of the proposed framework, thereby advancing the academic debate and informing best practices in public sector project management.

Section 4: Research Design

4.1 The Type of Research

This study adopts an exploratory research design, which is suitable for investigating the nuanced aspects of project management practices in the public sector. Exploratory research allows for the examination of complex phenomena, providing insights into the dynamics of methodologies, stakeholder engagement, and leadership in public service projects (Bogdanova et al., 2020; Eriksson et al., 2020). This approach is relevant as it enables a deeper understanding of the factors influencing project success in varied public sector contexts.

4.2 The Research Paradigm

The research will follow an interpretivist paradigm, which is appropriate for qualitative studies aiming to understand the subjective experiences and perceptions of individuals involved in public service project management (Zada et al., 2023). The interpretivist approach facilitates the exploration of participants’ views and practices, acknowledging the complexity and context-specific nature of public sector projects (Hendren et al., 2023). This paradigm is relevant to the study as it focuses on the meanings and interpretations that project managers, stakeholders, and leaders attribute to their experiences.

4.3 The Research Approach

A qualitative research approach will be employed, aligning with the study’s aim to explore in-depth experiences, perceptions, and practices within public service project management (Twum-Darko et al., 2023). Qualitative research is well-suited for examining the complexities of human behaviour and social phenomena, allowing the researcher to gather rich, descriptive data (Hendren et al., 2023). This approach is particularly relevant as it provides a detailed understanding of the interplay between project management methodologies, stakeholder engagement, and leadership dynamics.

4.4 The Sampling Method

The study will use purposive sampling to select participants who have direct experience and expertise in public service project management. Purposive sampling is appropriate for qualitative research as it allows for the selection of information-rich cases that can provide valuable insights into the research problem (Irfan et al., 2021; Lehtinen & Aaltonen, 2020). This method is relevant as it targets public service managers, policymakers, and stakeholders who can offer diverse perspectives on the factors influencing project success.

4.5 The Data Collection Method

Data will be collected through semi-structured interviews, which are effective in qualitative research for capturing in-depth information and allowing flexibility to explore participants’ perspectives (Zada et al., 2023; Twum-Darko et al., 2023). Secondary data, including organisational reports and literature on public service project management, will also be analysed to provide contextual background and support the primary data findings (Bogdanova et al., 2020). This combination of data sources is relevant as it enables a comprehensive examination of the research topic.

Section 5: Presentation of Findings

5.1 Present the Data

In this qualitative study, the data collected through semi-structured interviews with public service managers, policymakers, and project management professionals revealed several key themes related to project management in the public sector. The thematic analysis identified three primary themes: (1) the effectiveness of Agile versus traditional project management methodologies, (2) the role of stakeholder engagement in project success, and (3) the impact of leadership dynamics on project outcomes. Participants’ responses indicated a preference for Agile methodologies, highlighting the need for flexibility and adaptability in managing complex public service projects (Bogdanova et al., 2020). In terms of stakeholder engagement, the data emphasised the importance of early and continuous involvement of stakeholders to ensure project alignment with community needs (Twum-Darko et al., 2023). Additionally, leadership dynamics emerged as a critical factor, with participants underscoring the necessity of goal clarity and top management support to navigate the intricacies of public service projects (Zada et al., 2023).

5.2 Describe the Data

The interview data encompassed a range of perspectives, illustrating the diverse experiences of public service project management professionals. Participants frequently described their experiences with traditional project management (TPM) as being constrained by bureaucratic processes and a lack of flexibility, often resulting in delays and misalignment with stakeholder needs (Kaczorowska, 2020). In contrast, those who employed Agile methodologies reported enhanced adaptability and more successful outcomes, particularly in projects that involved multiple stakeholders and dynamic environments (Bogdanova et al., 2020). In terms of stakeholder engagement, respondents noted that projects with robust stakeholder involvement were more likely to achieve their objectives, as engagement fostered a sense of ownership and facilitated smoother project execution (Twum-Darko et al., 2023). Leadership was another prominent theme, with participants highlighting that successful project outcomes were often linked to clear communication, goal setting, and the active support of top management (Zada et al., 2023).

5.3 Analyse the Findings

The analysis of the findings suggests that Agile methodologies are more effective in managing public service projects compared to traditional approaches. Agile’s iterative and flexible nature allows for continuous adjustments and improvements, which is particularly beneficial in the public sector’s complex and often unpredictable environment (Bogdanova et al., 2020). This aligns with existing literature that advocates for Agile’s adaptability in dealing with changing requirements and stakeholder needs (Gasik, 2023). However, some participants also acknowledged challenges in implementing Agile practices, such as resistance to change and the need for cultural transformation within public sector organisations (Kaczorowska, 2020). This finding highlights a discrepancy between the theoretical advantages of Agile methodologies and the practical difficulties of their adoption in public institutions.

The analysis also reinforces the critical role of stakeholder engagement in public service projects. The findings indicate that early and continuous stakeholder involvement is crucial for aligning project goals with public needs, enhancing transparency, and building trust (Twum-Darko et al., 2023). This is consistent with the work of Coetzee et al. (2020), who argue that stakeholder analysis and engagement are vital for sustainable project outcomes. Interestingly, the findings also reveal that stakeholder engagement can sometimes lead to conflicting interests, posing challenges for project managers in balancing diverse expectations (Bahadorestani et al., 2020). This complexity underscores the need for strategic stakeholder management to navigate potential conflicts and ensure that engagement contributes positively to project success.

Leadership dynamics emerged as a significant determinant of project outcomes, with participants frequently citing goal clarity and top management support as key factors in driving project success (Zada et al., 2023). The data indicate that effective leadership practices, such as setting clear objectives, fostering collaboration, and providing strategic guidance, are essential for navigating the complexities of public service projects. This finding aligns with Eriksson et al. (2020), who emphasise the importance of collaborative leadership in creating value within public service organisations. However, the analysis also reveals instances where a lack of leadership support resulted in project failures or inefficiencies, highlighting the need for strong leadership commitment to guide projects through challenges (Irfan et al., 2021). This insight suggests that while leadership is widely recognized as a critical factor, its absence can significantly hinder project progress and outcomes.

5.4 Link to the Literature

The findings from this research both align with and diverge from existing literature in several ways. The preference for Agile methodologies among participants aligns with Bogdanova et al. (2020) and Gasik (2023), who advocate for Agile’s adaptability and iterative approach in managing complex public sector projects. However, the challenges of adopting Agile practices, such as organisational resistance and the need for cultural change, are consistent with Kaczorowska’s (2020) findings, suggesting that the theoretical benefits of Agile methodologies must be carefully weighed against practical implementation barriers in the public sector.

Regarding stakeholder engagement, the findings affirm the importance of involving stakeholders throughout the project lifecycle, as emphasised by Twum-Darko et al. (2023) and Coetzee et al. (2020). The data also resonate with Bahadorestani et al. (2020), who highlight the challenges of managing conflicting stakeholder interests. This indicates that while stakeholder engagement is crucial for project success, it requires strategic management to ensure that diverse interests are balanced and contribute positively to project outcomes.

In terms of leadership, the emphasis on goal clarity and top management support found in this study mirrors the conclusions of Zada et al. (2023) and Eriksson et al. (2020). The identification of leadership as a critical factor for project success aligns with the broader literature, which underscores the need for strong, collaborative leadership in public service project management. However, the findings also diverge from the literature in highlighting the potential consequences of inadequate leadership, where the absence of support can lead to project inefficiencies or failures. This discrepancy underscores the complex and context-specific nature of leadership in public service projects, indicating that while leadership is universally recognized as essential, its impact varies depending on the organisational environment and project context.

Overall, these findings contribute to the academic debate by providing a nuanced understanding of the interplay between project management methodologies, stakeholder engagement, and leadership in the public sector. By integrating these themes, the study offers a comprehensive framework for enhancing project management practices, highlighting the need for adaptive methodologies, strategic stakeholder engagement, and effective leadership to navigate the complexities of public service projects.

Section 6: Conclusion and Recommendations

6.1 Conclusions

The findings of this study provide significant insights into the effectiveness of project management practices in the public sector, particularly focusing on the methodologies employed, stakeholder engagement, and leadership dynamics. First, it is evident that Agile project management (APM) offers a more adaptable and responsive approach to managing public service projects compared to traditional project management (TPM) (Bogdanova et al., 2020; Gasik, 2023). Agile’s iterative process allows public service organisations to respond effectively to changing requirements and stakeholder needs, leading to more successful project outcomes. However, the challenges associated with adopting Agile methodologies, such as organisational resistance and the need for a cultural shift, suggest that implementation requires careful consideration and strategic planning (Kaczorowska, 2020).

Second, stakeholder engagement has been identified as a crucial factor in the success of public service projects. The study’s findings affirm that early and continuous involvement of stakeholders ensures that projects are aligned with the needs and expectations of the community, enhancing transparency and building trust (Twum-Darko et al., 2023; Coetzee et al., 2020). Nonetheless, the potential for conflicting stakeholder interests presents a challenge that project managers must navigate to maintain project focus and coherence (Bahadorestani et al., 2020). Third, leadership dynamics play a pivotal role in shaping project outcomes. The emphasis on goal clarity and top management support suggests that effective leadership practices are essential for guiding public service projects through complex environments and ensuring successful execution (Zada et al., 2023; Eriksson et al., 2020). However, the study also highlights that the absence of strong leadership can lead to inefficiencies and project failures, underscoring the critical need for committed and strategic leadership in public sector project management.

6.2 Recommendations

Based on these conclusions, several recommendations can be made to enhance project management practices in the public sector. Firstly, public service organisations should consider adopting Agile project management methodologies, particularly for projects that require adaptability and stakeholder involvement. However, to mitigate the challenges associated with Agile implementation, it is recommended that organisations invest in training and change management initiatives to foster a culture that is receptive to Agile principles (Kaczorowska, 2020). This approach would not only improve project outcomes but also ensure a smoother transition to Agile practices by addressing organisational resistance and facilitating cultural change.

Secondly, it is recommended that public service project managers develop robust stakeholder engagement strategies that prioritise early involvement and continuous communication. This involves conducting comprehensive stakeholder analysis to identify and understand the needs and expectations of diverse stakeholders, thereby facilitating more inclusive decision-making (Twum-Darko et al., 2023). By proactively managing stakeholder interests and addressing potential conflicts, project managers can enhance stakeholder trust and project alignment. This strategy would have positive implications for both internal and external stakeholders, fostering collaboration and ensuring that projects deliver tangible benefits to the community.

Thirdly, to address the identified need for strong leadership, public service organisations should invest in leadership development programs that emphasise strategic vision, goal clarity, and top management support (Zada et al., 2023). Leadership training should focus on equipping public service managers with the skills required to navigate the complexities of project management in the public sector, including fostering collaboration, setting clear objectives, and providing strategic guidance. By enhancing leadership competencies, organisations can ensure that projects are guided effectively from initiation to completion, thereby improving overall project success rates. This recommendation directly benefits project teams, stakeholders, and the community by ensuring that projects are executed with a clear vision and purpose.

6.3 Implications for Stakeholders

Implementing these recommendations carries significant implications for various stakeholders involved in public service projects. For public service managers and project teams, adopting Agile methodologies and enhancing leadership practices will require a shift in mindset and work practices, demanding a commitment to ongoing learning and adaptation (Bogdanova et al., 2020). Policymakers and top management must play a supportive role by providing the necessary resources and strategic direction to facilitate this transition. For stakeholders such as community members and beneficiaries of public services, the emphasis on stakeholder engagement means that their voices will be heard and considered throughout the project lifecycle, leading to more inclusive and responsive public service delivery (Coetzee et al., 2020).

Furthermore, addressing the challenges of stakeholder engagement requires a collaborative effort. Project managers must actively involve stakeholders in decision-making processes, creating platforms for dialogue and feedback. This engagement not only aligns projects with public needs but also ensures accountability and transparency, fostering trust between public service organisations and the communities they serve (Twum-Darko et al., 2023). By focusing on these strategies, public service projects can achieve greater alignment with stakeholder expectations, resulting in more effective and sustainable outcomes.

6.4 Conclusion

In conclusion, this study underscores the importance of adaptive methodologies, strategic stakeholder engagement, and effective leadership in enhancing project management practices within the public sector. By adopting Agile project management, fostering meaningful stakeholder involvement, and investing in leadership development, public service organisations can navigate the complexities of project execution and deliver services that are aligned with public needs and expectations. Stakeholders, including public service managers, policymakers, project teams, and the communities they serve, stand to benefit from the successful implementation of these recommendations. For public service managers and project teams, these findings provide a framework for improving project outcomes, while policymakers gain insights into supporting project management practices that foster public value. Ultimately, by embracing these strategies, public service organisations can enhance their capacity to deliver projects that are not only efficient and effective but also responsive to the dynamic needs of the public.

Section 7: References

Bahadorestani, A., Naderpajouh, N. and Sadiq, R., 2020. Planning for sustainable stakeholder engagement based on the assessment of conflicting interests in projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, p.118402.

Bogdanova, M., Parashkevova, E. and Stoyanova, M., 2020. Agile project management in the public sector–methodological aspects. Journal of European Economy, 19(2), pp.283-298.

Casady, C.B., Eriksson, K., Levitt, R.E. and Scott, W.R., 2020. (Re) defining public-private partnerships (PPPs) in the new public governance (NPG) paradigm: an institutional maturity perspective. Public Management Review, 22(2), pp.161-183.

Coetzee, S., Odijk, M., Van Loenen, B., Storm, J. and Stoter, J., 2020. Stakeholder analysis of the governance framework of a national SDI dataset–whose needs are met in the buildings and address register of the Netherlands?. International Journal of Digital Earth.

Eriksson, E., Andersson, T., Hellström, A., Gadolin, C. and Lifvergren, S., 2020. Collaborative public management: coordinated value propositions among public service organizations. Public Management Review, 22(6), pp.791-812.

Gasik, S., 2023. Some insights on the future of project management in public administration. Revista de Gestão e Projetos, 14(3), pp.27-39.

Hendren, K., Newcomer, K., Pandey, S.K., Smith, M. and Sumner, N., 2023. How qualitative research methods can be leveraged to strengthen mixed methods research in public policy and public administration?. Public Administration Review, 83(3), pp.468-485.

Irfan, M., Khan, S.Z., Hassan, N., Hassan, M., Habib, M., Khan, S. and Khan, H.H., 2021. Role of project planning and project manager competencies on public sector project success. Sustainability, 13(3), p.1421.

Kaczorowska, A., 2020. Traditional versus agile project management in public sector in Poland. Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie/Politechnika Śląska, (149), pp.287-302.

Lehtinen, J. and Aaltonen, K., 2020. Organizing external stakeholder engagement in inter-organizational projects: Opening the black box. International Journal of Project Management, 38(2), pp.85-98.

Twum-Darko, M., Ncede, N. and Tengeh, R., 2023. Stakeholder engagement: A service delivery-based strategy formulation process in the public sector of South Africa. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 12(3), pp.109-121.

Zada, M., Khan, J., Saeed, I., Zada, S. and Jun, Z.Y., 2023. Linking public leadership with project management effectiveness: Mediating role of goal clarity and moderating role of top management support. Heliyon, 9(5).